Following Their Hearts of Bigotry

I've previously commented on the bigotry and intolerance of the homosexual activists in Oregon as they try to push through a civil unions bill which will give benefits only to same-sex relationships at the same time they oppose a reciprocal-benefits bill which would give benefits to any two adults unable to marry. A thought occurred to my while reading an article from the Eugene (OR) Register-Guard. The article states:

"Opponents of the reciprocal-benefits bill have called it woefully inadequate. Among the areas they said it fell short was its lack of legal protections for a same-sex couple's children, the right to benefits through spouse-survivor life insurance, or the right to continue workers' compensation benefits if a partner is killed or disabled on the job."

I mentioned before it is interesting that the opposition doesn't say how to make the reciprocal-benefits bill better for any two adults. Instead they cling to giving benefits only to same-sex couples.

My thoughts is this: if they can't support reciprocal benefits for any two adults because it falls "woefully inadequate" then why don't they change the civil union bill to include benefits for any two adults?

The answer is that benefits for any two couples does not place homosexual relationships on the same level as heterosexual relationships. The radical homosexual activists were given a test to show that they were really for equality and they failed.

Because equality is not their goal. Normalization of homosexuality is.