Nature's Homophobic Bigotry

Associated Press writer, Daniel Yee, reports some revealing facts in his article, "More Than a Million in U.S. Live With HIV". Yee writes:

"Health officials say the prevention failure in part has come from an abandonment of safe sex practices by gay and bisexual men - who account for almost half of HIV cases. Experts think they may be weary of STD prevention messages. The majority of the others infected are high-risk heterosexuals and injection drug users. ... The CDC also warned those demographics may soon change because heterosexual blacks, women and others infected after having high-risk sex (such as with someone with HIV, an injection-drug user or a man who has sex with other men) now account for a larger proportion of those living with HIV than those who are living with full-blown AIDS." (emphasis added)

Notice the driving force behind the increase in HIV: unsafe sex by gay and bisexual men, intravenous drug users and high-risk heterosexuals (i.e. heterosexuals who have sex with the first two groups or someone who is already infected).

Why would non-high risk heterosexuals not be driving the increase in HIV cases while male homosexuals consist nearly half? Could it be in the way nature has designed the human body for sexual activity. In short, the penis is designed sexually for the vagina not the anus.

Activists want society's approval of homosexual behavior; the very behavior which we all know of life is detrimental to its participants' health. They want us to turn our faces from the incredible suffering and loss of life that this behavior produces. And when one turn their face from this destruction of humanity, they are labeled homophobes, hate-mongers, and gay-bashers for starters.

Activists' true anger, though, is against the very Nature that discriminates against homosexual activity in its design of human sexuality. It is Nature that is homophobic.